shb
供应商审核表
烦请贵公司先行填写供应商评审表自评及说明字段。威胜包装公司收到调查表,将视初评的结果告知是否需另外安排实地稽核。威胜包装将秉持公正态度,进行供应商品质系统稽核。依照品质稽核的结果,判定是否成为威胜包装合格供应商。
This evaluation is conducted to ensure the product or service provided by the vendor meets the WISEPAC requirements and to reduce the risk of WISEPAC as a result of vendor’s defective product/service.
Vendors should first fill out the Vendor Management Table and the Self-evaluation and Description columns in the Vendor Evaluation Table. WISEPAC will notify the vendor if an onsite evaluation is necessary according to the preliminary evaluation results. The aduit of the vendor’s qualify system will be fair and unimpaired. WISEPAC will judge whether or not a vendor is qualified according to the results of quality audit.
This evaluation falls into three sections.
2.2 评审人员请依照评审项目与结果,给予评判分数,填于供应商评核表内。
Evaluators should score each item according to the evaluation results and fill out the scores in the table.
得分(Score)
等级(Grade)
描述(Description)
NA
不适用(NA)
评审内容不适用(Evaluation contents not applicable)
0
极差(Poorest )
不具功能(Useless)
2
不良 (Fail)
具有功能,但仍需要很大的改善,以达成适当的品质水准
(Useful, but needs lots of improvements to reach the standard)
3
尚可(Pass)
大致符合品质系统要求,仍有部份的改善空间
(Meets the quality system requirements in general, but with room for improvement)
4
良好(Good)
具有好的品质系统,且完全符合供应商所需资格
(The quality system is good and meets the vendor requirements)
5
极佳(Excellent)
具有卓越的品质系统,且超过供应商所需资格
(The quality system is excellent and superior to the vendor requirements)
The evaluation falls in to three sections (purchase, QA and engineering), and there are some questions in each section.
评 鉴 分类/Section
权重/Weight (%)
30%
40%
30%
品质系统总分=Σ(各分类总分 x 权重)
Quality system total score =Σ(total score of each section X weight)
Vendors should meet the delivery punctuality and price requirements and their product pass the reliability test, and the system total score must be over 70 before they can become a qualified vendor. Failure in any item will not be accepted as a qualified vendor.
保存期限:3年 Form. No :FC40102
Rev: C
(一)采购/ Section 1 Purchase(QSA部分)
供应商填表日期(Completed on (vendor)):
供应商名称(Vendor name):
填表人/部门(Completed by/dept.):
WISEPAC填表日期(Completed on (WISEPAC)):
评审人员(Evaluated by):
评审项目
(Evaluation Item)
评审内容(Evaluation Contents)
供应商自评
(Vendor Self-evaluation)
WISEPAC评分(Score)
1.采购
Purchase
(1) 是否建立原材料合格供应商名单,定期进行品质评审及修改此名单;并参考评比结果要求供应商进行品质改善活动或据此调整采购量?
Have you a qualified vendor list for raw materials? Do you review their quality and update the list over time? Do you ask vendors to make improvements or adjust your purchase according to the review results?
- 目的(Objectives)
烦请贵公司先行填写供应商评审表自评及说明字段。威胜包装公司收到调查表,将视初评的结果告知是否需另外安排实地稽核。威胜包装将秉持公正态度,进行供应商品质系统稽核。依照品质稽核的结果,判定是否成为威胜包装合格供应商。
This evaluation is conducted to ensure the product or service provided by the vendor meets the WISEPAC requirements and to reduce the risk of WISEPAC as a result of vendor’s defective product/service.
Vendors should first fill out the Vendor Management Table and the Self-evaluation and Description columns in the Vendor Evaluation Table. WISEPAC will notify the vendor if an onsite evaluation is necessary according to the preliminary evaluation results. The aduit of the vendor’s qualify system will be fair and unimpaired. WISEPAC will judge whether or not a vendor is qualified according to the results of quality audit.
- 评审基准(Evaluation Criteria)
This evaluation falls into three sections.
2.2 评审人员请依照评审项目与结果,给予评判分数,填于供应商评核表内。
Evaluators should score each item according to the evaluation results and fill out the scores in the table.
得分(Score)
等级(Grade)
描述(Description)
NA
不适用(NA)
评审内容不适用(Evaluation contents not applicable)
0
极差(Poorest )
不具功能(Useless)
2
不良 (Fail)
具有功能,但仍需要很大的改善,以达成适当的品质水准
(Useful, but needs lots of improvements to reach the standard)
3
尚可(Pass)
大致符合品质系统要求,仍有部份的改善空间
(Meets the quality system requirements in general, but with room for improvement)
4
良好(Good)
具有好的品质系统,且完全符合供应商所需资格
(The quality system is good and meets the vendor requirements)
5
极佳(Excellent)
具有卓越的品质系统,且超过供应商所需资格
(The quality system is excellent and superior to the vendor requirements)
- 得分计算方式的说明(Score Calculation)
The evaluation falls in to three sections (purchase, QA and engineering), and there are some questions in each section.
评 鉴 分类/Section
权重/Weight (%)
- 采购/Purchase
30%
- 品保/QRA
40%
- 工程/Engineering
30%
品质系统总分=Σ(各分类总分 x 权重)
Quality system total score =Σ(total score of each section X weight)
- 合格供应商判定基准(Qualified Vendor Criteria)
Vendors should meet the delivery punctuality and price requirements and their product pass the reliability test, and the system total score must be over 70 before they can become a qualified vendor. Failure in any item will not be accepted as a qualified vendor.
保存期限:3年 Form. No :FC40102
Rev: C
(一)采购/ Section 1 Purchase(QSA部分)
供应商填表日期(Completed on (vendor)):
供应商名称(Vendor name):
填表人/部门(Completed by/dept.):
WISEPAC填表日期(Completed on (WISEPAC)):
评审人员(Evaluated by):
评审项目
(Evaluation Item)
评审内容(Evaluation Contents)
供应商自评
(Vendor Self-evaluation)
WISEPAC评分(Score)
1.采购
Purchase
(1) 是否建立原材料合格供应商名单,定期进行品质评审及修改此名单;并参考评比结果要求供应商进行品质改善活动或据此调整采购量?
Have you a qualified vendor list for raw materials? Do you review their quality and update the list over time? Do you ask vendors to make improvements or adjust your purchase according to the review results?