您还没有绑定微信,更多功能请点击绑定

关于分层审核

关于分层审核哪位同行有这方面工作经验,能介绍一下么
对“好”的回答一定要点个"赞",回答者需要你的鼓励!
已邀请:

xn58 (威望:6) (海外 北美) Quality Engineer

赞同来自:

1.many points in LPA actually are the duties of employees., such as precheck of error proofing equipment.They have to do their job on daily basis.So no need to make another new name and creat many wasteful paperwork.
  1. In the actual world, most of process design or product deign are not robust. There are always some difference between paper process and real process. These difference will usually make the auditor embrassed .
  2. If the auditor is not familar with the process, the auditing is eay to become a 'show". Auditee will try to show instead of real improvement.

Many others. Generally, I don't like the Chrysler's LPA. Also, though Chrysler has created so many paperwork, its quality is like a garbage.

I prefer Toyota's production mode which is based on HUman Being , not paperwork .

12 个回复,游客无法查看回复,更多功能请登录注册

发起人

扫一扫微信订阅<6SQ每周精选>