Cg/Cgk 量具检测能力指数
有谁知道和熟悉?参与讨论:
Cg/Cgk are Instrument Capability Indexes.
The idea for Cg is the same than for Cp, the "conceptual" formula for Cg is:
Cg = (allowable variation)/(actual variation
The differences are what we take for allowable and actual variation. For Cp, the actual variation is the process variation, and the allowed variation is the specification range.
For Cg, the actual variation is the INSTRUMENT ALONE variation (6 x Sinst No between parts, within part, between operators or along time variation is included. About 50 measurements are made consecutively on a master gauge or "best available" part, and always on the same point of the part, and by the same person, and in a controlled environment (usually the metrology room
The allowable variation is taken as 1/5 of the process variation (6 x Sproc) or 1/5 of the product specification range, depending on whether you want the instrument to control the process or to check conformance of the parts, then:
Cg=(0.2 x 6 x Sproc)/(6 x Sinst)=Sproc/5Sinst
or
Cg=(0.2 x Tol))/(6 x Sinst)=Tol/30Sinst
Cgk, as Cpk, takes into account the position (which would be the bias):
Cgk=(0.5 of the allowable variation - |bias|) / (0.5 of the actual variation)
The idea of Cg/Cgk is to have this information in advance to use it for the decision about if the instrument would be "selectable" for a given measurement. If you decide to include the instrument in a measurement system that you will include in the control plan, only then you make the Gauge R&R with the full system, the real process parts and the full measurement variation. But you don't want to develop a measuring system, design and build a measurement device, and write the measuring instructions only to find that the instrument itself could have never been capable of such a measurement
{W
Cg/Cgk are Instrument Capability Indexes.
The idea for Cg is the same than for Cp, the "conceptual" formula for Cg is:
Cg = (allowable variation)/(actual variation
The differences are what we take for allowable and actual variation. For Cp, the actual variation is the process variation, and the allowed variation is the specification range.
For Cg, the actual variation is the INSTRUMENT ALONE variation (6 x Sinst No between parts, within part, between operators or along time variation is included. About 50 measurements are made consecutively on a master gauge or "best available" part, and always on the same point of the part, and by the same person, and in a controlled environment (usually the metrology room
The allowable variation is taken as 1/5 of the process variation (6 x Sproc) or 1/5 of the product specification range, depending on whether you want the instrument to control the process or to check conformance of the parts, then:
Cg=(0.2 x 6 x Sproc)/(6 x Sinst)=Sproc/5Sinst
or
Cg=(0.2 x Tol))/(6 x Sinst)=Tol/30Sinst
Cgk, as Cpk, takes into account the position (which would be the bias):
Cgk=(0.5 of the allowable variation - |bias|) / (0.5 of the actual variation)
The idea of Cg/Cgk is to have this information in advance to use it for the decision about if the instrument would be "selectable" for a given measurement. If you decide to include the instrument in a measurement system that you will include in the control plan, only then you make the Gauge R&R with the full system, the real process parts and the full measurement variation. But you don't want to develop a measuring system, design and build a measurement device, and write the measuring instructions only to find that the instrument itself could have never been capable of such a measurement
{W
没有找到相关结果
已邀请:
24 个回复
Hcheng (威望:0)
赞同来自: LeoLoski